https://doi.org/10.46793/TIL2025.005P DOI ikonica

PARTICIPATORY TECHNOLOGY GAP ASSESSMENT FOR SMART MOBILITY: EVIDENCE FROM SIX PILOT TERRITORIES

Authors:

Marijana PETROVIĆ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-9238
University of Belgrade-Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia; Innovation Center of the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia
Stanko BAJČETIĆ https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-1795
University of Belgrade-Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia; Innovation Center of the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia
Barbara MONACO
Area Science Park, Trieste, Italy
Silvia ZAMPESE
Area Science Park, Trieste, Italy
Katerina NIKOLOPOULOU
CIVINET Greece-Cyprus, Athens, Greece
Hara LIAKOU
CIVINET Greece-Cyprus, Athens, Greece

Abstract: The deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) is central to advancing smart and sustainable mobility, yet many cities still struggle to align technological readiness with planning capacity and societal needs. This paper presents a participatory methodology for technology gap assessment applied in six pilot territories in the Adriatic–Ionian region. Using a Gap Analysis Tool across five domains—technical readiness, interoperability, scalability, sustainability impact, and user acceptance—the assessment, conducted with local Stakeholder Working Groups, identifies strengths in data-driven services and real-time passenger information, while revealing gaps in advanced traffic management, integrated fare systems, and user engagement. The findings show how participatory approaches help cities better understand readiness conditions and support evidence-based mobility transitions. Building on this socio-technical foundation, the paper also outlines the next research stage: a forward-looking exercise developing technology roadmaps and participatory pathways that translate identified gaps into scalable trajectories for next-generation ITS deployment.

Keywords: Participatory assessment, Smart mobility, Intelligent Transport Systems, Key enabling technologies, Stakeholder engagement, Adriatic–Ionian region

Pages: 5-12

The paper is available at the following link: Pregled rada...

REFERENCES:

1. Angelidou, M., Politis, C., Fellnhofer, K., 2025, Participatory and responsible policy-design for urban planning, transport and energy driven by innovation: a guidebook, Discover Cities, 2(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00076-0
2. Giuffrida, N., Le Pira, M., Inturri, G., Ignaccolo, M., 2019, Mapping with stakeholders: Public participatory GIS and VGI in transport decision-making, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(4), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8040198
3. MobiliseYourCity Partnership, 2022, Participatory Processes in Urban Mobility Planning, Topic Guide, 58 p. Available at: https://www.mobiliseyourcity.net/sites/default/files/2022-05/Topic%20guide%20-%20Participatory%20processes%20in%20urban%20mobility%20planning.pdf
4. European Commission, 2020, Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy: Putting European Transport on Track for the Future. COM/2020/789 final. Available at:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52020DC0789
5. Papa, E., Lauwers, D., 2015, Smart mobility: Opportunity or threat to innovate places and cities?, REAL CORP 2015 Proceedings, 543–550. Full text: https://www.corp.at/archive/CORP2015_46.pdf
6. OECD/ITF, 2021, The Innovative Mobility Landscape: The Case of Mobility as a Service, OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/07/the-innovative-mobility-landscape_dd48a2d6/46903a00-en.pdf
7. Kotri, B., Xhelilaj, F., Toçi, B., 2025, Analysis of Drivers and Barriers to Smart Mobility Solutions Uptake in the Adriatic–Ionian Area (SMARTMOBAIR Deliverable D.1.1.3), Albanian Institute of Transport (AIT). Available at:
https://smartmobair.interreg-ipa-adrion.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/D.1.1.3-Analysis-of-drivers-and-barriers-to-smart-mobility-solutions-uptake-in-the-Adriatic-Ionian-area-1.pdf
8. Lyons, G., 2018, Getting smart about urban mobility: Aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable, Transportation Research Part A, 115, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.001
9. Foth, M., 2017, Participation, co-creation and public space in the smart city, The Journal of Public Space, 2(4), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.5204/jps.v2i4.139
10. Petrović, M., Vidović, N., 2019, TQM tools in support to urban mobility shift: Exploring possibilities to transfer EU practice to Serbia, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Transport and Logistics, Niš, 103–111. https://til.masfak.ni.ac.rs/images/til-pedja/Proceedings_til2019-1.pdf
11. Petrović, M., Bojković, N., Pejčić-Tarle, S., Parezanović, T., 2017, Quality management audit schemes in sustainable urban mobility—Learning from EU experience, Proceedings of the International Working Conference “Total Quality Management – Advanced and Intelligent Approaches”, 5–9 June 2017, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Serbia. Serbia. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marijana-Petrovic-4/publication/333682766_Quality_management_audit_schemes_in_sustainable_urban_mobility_-learning_from_EU_experience/links/5cff9101299bf13a384ca065/Quality-management-audit-schemes-in-sustainable-urban-mobility-learning-from-EU-experience.pdf
12. Petrović, M., Živanović, P., Bajčetić, S., Maraš, V., 2024, Technology Gap Assessment (SMARTMOBAIR Deliverable D.1.4.1), ICMF. Available at: https://smartmobair.interreg-ipa-adrion.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/D.1.4.1-Technology-gap-assessment.pdf
13. World Bank. (2023). Smart Mobility Toolkit: Implementing Smart Urban Mobility Solutions. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099041624092522974
14. European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC). (2021). Public Transport Research and Innovation in Europe: Key achievements and directions for the future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC130482
15. Paiva, S., Ahad, M.A.R., Tripathi, G., Feroz, N., Casalino, G., 2021, Enabling technologies for urban smart mobility: Recent trends, opportunities and challenges, Sensors, 21(7), 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062143
16. Strazza, C., Olivieri, N., De Rose, A., Stevens, T., et al., 2017, Technology Readiness Level – Guidance Principles for Renewable Energy Technologies – Final Report, European Commission, DG Research & Innovation. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/577767
17. Živković, P., Tomić, M., Ayed, S., Milutinović, B., Vukić, M., 2017, An assessment of the traffic-related emissions in the city of Niš, Facta Universitatis, Series: Working and Living Environmental Protection, 14(1), 87–92. Available at: https://casopisi.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/FUWorkLivEnvProt/article/view/1433
18. Ayed, S., Tomić, M.A., Živković, P.M., 2015, Specific approach for estimating traffic-induced urban pollution, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24(6), 2739–2744. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/58763
19. City of Niš, 2024, Air Quality Plan for the Territory of the City of Niš for the Period 2023–2028 (excerpt included in the Voluntary Local Review).
https://www.gold.uclg.org/sites/default/files/field-document/nis_2024_en.pdf
20. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P., Probert, D.R., 2004, Technology roadmapping: A planning framework for evolution and revolution, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1–2), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6
21. Saritas, O., Aylen, J., 2010, Using scenarios for roadmapping: The case of clean production, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(7), 1061–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.003